Dear Mark,
I need further clarification on how "all-in" works in Texas
Hold'em. This happened on television the other night while I was watching
a poker tournament: Player "A" with a massive amount of chips
bet a substantial amount of money, and player "B," with far
fewer chips, consequently went all-in. Do I understand that if player
B had won he would only have received the portion of the pot that he
could cover? If so what happens to the rest of the pot? Maribeth K.
To go "All-in,"
Maribeth, is to bet all the money you personally have on the table.
A player who is all-in cannot be forced out of the pot, but can win
only that portion of the pot that he or she is eligible for.
In your example, player B did not have enough table stakes to cover
future raises, so he went all-in. He was simply contesting that portion
of the pot that his money would cover.
Had other players still been active in the hand, wagers could still
have been made, but those bets would then comprise a side pot. At the
end of the hand, the side pot is decided first, then the main pot. Player
B would not be eligible to win the side pot since he had no money invested
in it, and it would therefore be distributed among the surviving players
as though there had been no Player B.
Dear Mark,
Where I play, they just introduced single deck blackjack. As a trade-off,
you do not get a full payoff for a blackjack. The dealer said you make
up for it with the single deck. Was he right? Jim B.
The dealer dealt
you erroneous information, a bad deal, one might say. On these single
deck games, blackjacks are paid at 6 to 5 odds ($6 for $5 bet) instead
of the usual 3 to 2 odds ($7.50 for $5 wagered). This one rule change,
making for a 12-to-ten payoff in place of the customary 15-to-ten, raises
the casino edge around 1.5 percent. Two thumbs down!
Dear Mark,
I was playing Texas Hold'em with my wife and got a pair of Kings. Nothing
that followed, the flop, fourth or fifth street, helped either of us.
As this was the final hand of the evening, we decided to bet dinner
at our favorite restaurant on the outcome. Wouldn't you know it, she
had aces. What were the odds of her having aces? Clay B.
You'd think, Clay,
with a starting hand of Kings, dinner would be on your spouse, but against
your wife's pocket rockets (aces), you only had a 17.82% chance of winning.
As to the odds of your wife having aces, there are 1326 two-card combinations
that can be made from a 52 card deck, with six combinations for each
pocket pair. 1326 divided by 6 equals 221, therefore, the odds of your
wife being dealt pocket aces, or any other pocket pair (your Cowboys
for that matter), are 220 to 1. In some happy marriages, the wife always
wins on the last hand.
Dear Mark,
What are your thoughts on machines that constantly shuffle cards? Jay
P.
No fan here, Jay.
My hang-up is that continuous shuffle machines have a negative effect
on the typical blackjack player, primarily because the casino gets 20
percent more hands dealt per hour by using them. With more hands per
hour, the player's hourly loss increases, since the casino already holds
an edge over the average player.
Gambling quote
of the week: "How long does it take to learn poker, Dad?"
"All you life, Son."-Michael Pertwee