Jeff
Simpson Sees Dangerous Trend in Nevada's Inaction on Growing Online
Action
by
Jeff Simpson - Our Partner at the Las Vegas Sun
LAS
VEGAS, Nevada Nevada
gaming regulators need to get tough, in a hurry.
The state's
Gaming Control Board takes great pride in being strict enforcers
of the rules that govern Nevada gambling.
And they are
- for the most part.
But the meteoric
growth of the poker business has blinded the gaming industry's cops,
and they seem unable to deal with the new realities that have accompanied
the rise of Internet poker.
Playing poker
online for money is illegal in Nevada, according to state law, and
the federal government says it is illegal everywhere in the United
States, a stance the online poker business hopes the courts will
overturn.
Nevada gaming
regulators originally took a tough stand against Internet poker.
They forced
prospective gaming license applicants to sell their ownership stakes
in online casinos. They prohibited poker tournaments in state casinos
from licensing online poker rooms to conduct official satellite
tournaments that send winners to play in Nevada events.
They did so
because almost every top Web poker room accepts bets from the United
States, including Nevada.
Regulators considered
the poker Web sites to be lawbreakers.
That was when
the online poker business was still relatively small. But after
Tennessee accountant Chris Moneymaker parlayed his $40 PokerStars
satellite victory into a (non-officially sanctioned) entry into
the 2003 World Series of Poker championship event at Binion's Horseshoe
and took down the top prize of $2.5 million, the online business
exploded.
Online poker
sites ran countless commercials on the dozens of hours of televised
poker shows available each week.
The revenue
stream fueled more poker TV shows. With Moneymaker's win and the
TV exposure, Web poker boomed, as did revenue in Las Vegas poker
rooms and the tournaments they held.
The World Series
of Poker championship event drew 839 entries in 2003, a number that
jumped to 2,576 in 2004, 5,519 last year and is expected to reach
8,000 or more this year.
Those skyrocketing
numbers have been driven by online sites.
One week ago
PokerStars held a single online satellite tournament that will send
an incredible 234 players into this year's WSOP $10,000-entry championship
event. Dozens of other sites will send thousands more entrants.
What I find
astonishing is that the Gaming Control Board allows the properties
hosting major poker events to ally themselves so closely with poker
Web sites that invite players to break the law.
At the WSOP,
now under way at the Rio, Harrah's sold official hospitality rooms
just steps away from the poker competition to several online poker
rooms: Doyle's Room, Bodog and Ultimatebet. Other sites rent luxurious
suites at the host hotel, the Rio.
From the felt
tops of the WSOP poker tables, which feature a PartyPoker logo,
to World Series media director Nolan Dalla, also a top spokesman
for PokerStars, the incestuous relationship between legal Nevada
casino poker and illegal online poker has never been clearer.
Harrah's can
get away with the close partnerships because the online operators
use their Web sites' "dot net" suffix, meaning that they
call themselves by the names of their "educational" sister
sites that offer free play instead of poker for money.
Ultimatebet.com,
where you can bet, with a wink becomes Ultimatebet.net, where you
can't. So Harrah's isn't technically partnering with illegal operators,
and regulators aren't technically allowing a rule-breaking partnership.
Control Board
Chairman Dennis Neilander says the distinction between the dot-coms
and the dot-nets matters and that regulators don't see a problem
with the dot-net marketing at the WSOP.
He's wrong.
The dot-net distinction shouldn't make a difference. Nevada casino
operators shouldn't be partnering with illegal online casino operators
- or their shadow sites.
It's time for
Nevada regulators to say enough is enough and prove they still have
the backbone to stand up to the big money of online casinos.
|